Vote Up
1
Votes
Vote Down
May 3, 2011 7:12 PM
4 comments

With proper operating systems, “terminal” means precisely what it means to the outside world: fatal, beyond recovery, dead.

With the Linux desktop?

Well, let’s just try to coax the thing back to some semblance of half-life with a terminal session, shall we?

After all, there’s always bash. Such an encouraging name.

Related Trademarks

#1 Posted by bassboy on May 3, 2011 8:14 PM

Running out of ideas, aren’t you?

#2 Posted by ChrisTX on May 4, 2011 7:05 PM

Reminds me of a happening some years ago:
My dad had some issue with his computer, and in order to fix it I opened cmd.exe (think for ipconfig, doesn’t matter).
He asked me however, why I’d be using that DOS box with these plain old commands you still had to learn.
I did not know what to answer, tbh.

Nowadays, I only use PowerShell when I want to see the output of some advanced WMI query or want custom statistics being printed out. Few lines in psh and due to OO it’s done.

Still, I close the “terminal” afterwards. Linux? Not so much.

#3 Posted by DigitalAtheist on May 5, 2011 1:27 PM

Hell, Linux should come with an uncloseable terminal since according to every user and screenshot it is the only thing that is every used.

#4 Posted by DrLoser on May 6, 2011 6:07 PM

Uncloseable is not enough. (Leaving aside the minor issue with X doing it for you.)

A Modal Terminal, that’s what you need. Spinning. In glorious 3-D.

You must be signed in to leave comments.