Vote Up
5
Votes
Vote Down

Could be SJVN, master administrator of every server system ever invented (even the ones he’s never used).

Could be Poggo (on almost anything. He’s a must-read on how to bake a reconstituted potato after you’ve shot it with a hunting rifle, though).

Could be Schestowitz, who manically aggregates almost any story or blog with the word “Microsoft” in it … and then doesn’t bother to read them.

Could be Katherine Noyes, who is the master of her own domain — which is why every single link she provides is to another article she wrote.

Or it could be Adam King. Shell scripting, C programming, graphics, calculus, operating systems, you name it: Adam knows what he’s talking about.

Do they do degrees in bullshit? Because if not it’s hard to see where these self-appointed saviours of the world get their confidence from.

#1 Posted by Adam_King on Oct 23, 2011 9:34 AM

You are obsessed.

#2 Posted by JoeMonco on Oct 23, 2011 9:41 AM

“You are obsessed.”

Isn’t that rich coming from a self-appointed evangelist in a website that’s clearly in opposition to his agenda?

#3 Posted by DrLoser on Oct 23, 2011 9:43 AM

@Adam:

No, homoeroticism is not my thing. I leave that to you and to your many puppets.

#4 Posted by Adam_King on Oct 23, 2011 9:45 AM

I’m just here for the lulz, JoeMonco. Always has been, always will be.

#5 Posted by DrLoser on Oct 23, 2011 9:46 AM

In which case you’re living, dribbling proof that Loons have no sense of humour.

Seriously, get a life.

#6 Posted by Adam_King on Oct 23, 2011 9:47 AM

“DrLoser” telling me to get a life? Seriously?

#7 Posted by DrLoser on Oct 23, 2011 9:49 AM

No, not seriously at all. Stay pitiful and ignorant. Go with what you know.

#8 Posted by Adam_King on Oct 23, 2011 9:56 AM

Thought so.

#9 Posted by JoeMonco on Oct 23, 2011 10:05 AM

“I’m just here for the lulz, JoeMonco. Always has been, always will be.”

Then I must say that you certainly did a good job bringing us all the laughter at your own expense.

#10 Posted by Adam_King on Oct 23, 2011 10:36 AM

Through mild agriprop, I basically can taunt the entire site to have pointless conversation with me. Like for instance, right now.

RockStarAntiHater™

#11 Posted by JoeMonco on Oct 23, 2011 10:40 AM

“Through mild agriprop, I basically can taunt the entire site to have pointless conversation with me. Like for instance, right now.”

Don’t worry – I am environmentally conscious enough to only give the amount you have offered in return in order to minimize my carbon footprint. Haven’t you noticed that for all these times?

#12 Posted by DigitalAtheist on Oct 23, 2011 11:16 AM

Agriprop? What does propoganda about crops have to do with this place?

#13 Posted by DrLoser on Oct 23, 2011 11:25 AM

How dare you attack somebody’s mental disability?

Besides, spelling was only an elective at Podunk Hairdressers’ Lurnin’ Facility. (Motto: “24 hours from Baltimore.”)

#14 Posted by imgx64 on Oct 23, 2011 11:41 AM

“Through mild agriprop, I basically can taunt the entire site to have pointless conversation with me. Like for instance, right now.

RockStarAntiHater™”

Sadly, he’s right.

Also, may I suggest a few Wikipedia articles:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Agitprop
“describes stage plays, pamphlets, motion pictures and other art forms with an explicitly political message.”

Note that:
1- You probably mean AGITiation propaganda, not AGRIculture propaganda (which is quite different).
2- Your comments don’t count; they’re neither art nor politics. They’re just plain trolling.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shill
“Shill typically refers to someone who purposely gives onlookers the impression that he or she is an enthusiastic independent customer of a seller (or marketer of ideas) that he or she is secretly working for.”

He’s openly being paid, not secretly. Therefore, he is not a shill.

Now can people stop feeding th- Meh, it’s pointless. I’m just not going to bother.

#15 Posted by Adam_King on Oct 23, 2011 12:01 PM

Thank you for the spelling correction my loyal sockpuppet.

#16 Posted by DrLoser on Oct 23, 2011 12:31 PM

If you’re going to insult him, Adam, why don’t you go the whole hog and call him a Mong?

I mean, your self-imposed standards are really slipping here. Get a grip, little man.

#17 Posted by Adam_King on Oct 23, 2011 4:49 PM

Ok.

Imgx64, you are a “Mong”.

You must be signed in to leave comments.