2
Votes
Dec 16, 2009 5:28 PM
5 comments
When a young Linux advocate decides it is all too hard to justify his/her stance or juvenile behaviors after a series of failed attempts at fallacy tricks and/or lame excuses, he/she will eventually come to the laughable conclusion that a trollish comeback such as “fall asleep“ will by some freak chance do Linux or other fellow advocates a favor. Either that, or the Linux advocate in question is just sleep-typing.
See comment section in:
http://tmrepository.com/fudtracker/the-uf-staff-is-quite-knowledgeable-about-security/
Comments
I wonder if we should keep track of FUD in the FUD tracker using said FUD tracker as well. Though that assumes we have actual standards and each of us isn’t just doing our own thing, which we’ve sort of managed thus far.
That would involve recursion. Let’s not confuse the freetards with concepts from Computer Science.
But… but… they already know computer science. Don’t you know? Assembling massive commands consisting of $program1 |$program2 <$file1 -option `$program3` |$program 4 >/dev/null is the perfect way to learn about whether to use trees or hashtables.
Hah! Let’s see them try that in Haskell!
Incidentally, you also missed out “xargs.”
Shame on you! You obviously have no clue about Computer Science.
You must be signed in to leave comments.