Vote Up
3
Votes
Vote Down

Codethulhu

Picture (mis?)appropriated from The DailyWTF. Nothing to do with what follows; I just like the picture.

I was reading the miserable, whining thread on apologies at OMGUbuntu and a comment reminded me of this.

Apparently, you’re supposed to sign up to it if you’re an aspirant Ubuntard. All very noble, like signing up to a chastity pledge. But what is it, exactly?

Well.

It’s five throat-clearing (this has nothing to do with chastity, naturally) paragraphs of marketing self-congratulation, which would have no place in an actual Code of Conduct. Followed by (headers with my translation):

Be considerate. (This is especially important when somebody on a Ubuntu site disagrees with you, however mildly. Be considerate of all our other lunatics, and, since you’re speaking for all of them, make sure that you call the EVIL TRAITOROUS M$ SHILL SCUM an asshole.)

Be respectful. (Some people may have problems with Ubuntu. They may even bring these problems on to a Ubuntu site. Respectfully point out to them that they are full of shit, should have RTFM — even though it doesn’t exist, need to understand the CLI, are expecting too much, and don’t deserve your attention in any way except to point out that their buttocks would be more attractive once somebody has torn a second asshole between them. Bonus points if, as with Bug 326066, they’re a silly person with an Indian name who’s provided you with four or five possible patches for a bug and asked politely for a review.)

Be collaborative. (Sometimes, it’s not enough for one person on a Ubuntu forum to blub that Lucid Lynx is the finest ever contribution to Mankind — technically, artistically, and for that little wet spot you get in your underpants whilst contemplating it. No, it’s not enough! Everybody else on the same thread should immediately jump in and say exactly the same thing.)

When we disagree, we consult others. (Not from upstream, obviously. And not users either. And we’re not all that bothered about documenters or testers or designers. To tell the truth, we don’t even care much about packagers, and obviously we have no time at all for developers. We have a shit-load of artificial “management boards” and self-declared gurus, but if I were you I’d just consult Mark. Mark knows best.)

When we are unsure, we ask for help. (You won’t regret it! Insults are good for you! Much better than getting things fixed!)

Step down considerately. (When “Being Considerate” just isn’t enough.)

This is like the Boy Scouts, only far less coherent. Unsurprisingly, practice rarely, if ever, conforms to theory.

For extra giggles, refer to the Ubuntu Leadership Code Of Conduct.

In a final exercise of pure bathos, note that:

The Ubuntu code of conduct is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 licence.

Ah.

Yes.

You need to license a fucking code of conduct?

Wow.

——————————————-

Updated Aug 11th to incorporate Codethulhu and Bug 326066. It’s an endless spiral of pathetically obvious fail.

#1 Posted by JoeMonco on Aug 10, 2010 1:42 PM

SolidGoldComment™ – by “-cybervegan” [Moderator] (from that OMGUbuntu link):

“Benjamin, you need to learn a few things about FOSS (Free and OpenSource Software).

As an Ubuntu user, you are deeply indebted to the principles of FOSS. You wouldn’t have an operating system about which to get so opinionated, if it wasn’t for the very principles you are suggesting we should abandon.”

Translation: How dare you mortal question the Ubuntu gods? Your opinion is simply worthless without FOSS. Be gone, ungrateful cultling, before Suttleworth strikes you down with a lightning bolt.

#2 Posted by DrLoser on Aug 10, 2010 5:54 PM

Well, yes, except that if Shuttleworth was ever put in charge of lightning bolts, he’d buff them up with the Gimp so that they cast a nice shadow and had a pop-up attached in a big ugly font explaining that “This is a li….lt.”

It would also refuse to come out of hibernation (he’s bound to get that stuff working at some stage) and be Platform Neutral. Since the two platforms are (a) the ground and (b) teh cloudz, it would therefore pack all the wallop of a soggy bag of fritos.

There’s a Distro in that, somewhere.

#3 Posted by DrLoser on Aug 10, 2010 6:01 PM

How can you be indebted to something that’s free?

#4 Posted by Radioactive_afikomen on Aug 11, 2010 1:09 AM

They used a Creative Commons license and not GNU Free Documentation? Blasphemy!

So what if the GNU Free Documentation License is an impractical piece of crap? It’s not like that’s stopped them from using Linux.

#5 Posted by Radioactive_afikomen on Aug 11, 2010 1:10 AM

What? No html in comments? Harrumph.

#6 Posted by DrLoser on Aug 11, 2010 12:06 PM

I think you do them like this (preparing to fail): http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/GNU_Free_Documentation_License

#7 Posted by DrLoser on Aug 11, 2010 12:06 PM

(Not very helpful; sorry. Just paste the URL in, possibly with a full stop after it, and it’ll work.)

#8 Posted by Radioactive_afikomen on Aug 11, 2010 2:48 PM

I see. Thanks.

#9 Posted by DrLoser on Aug 11, 2010 4:56 PM

No worries. We like to Be Considerate around here, you worthless Illegal Monopoliez $hill Faggot.

(Actually it would be nice if TMR fixed this at some stage. Consistency is the Hobgoblin of Basement Trolls, and all that…)

You must be signed in to leave comments.