Boy, another shiny little gem from our favorite business adviser/friendly neighborhood cat lady Katherine Noyes! Really, what’s the harm there to take some two bob’s worth from a tech-bloid editor for your organizational needs if not just for a few chuckles?
“Following in the footsteps of numerous other governments around the world, Moscow has reportedly set aside 150 million rubles to develop a national software system that’s based instead on Linux. Its goals? To reduce Russia’s dependence on Microsoft and to increase security, according to reports.”
Let’s assume the good folk at Moscow are not actually planning to build a few extra mansions in a tropical island. Let’s also assume that this whole “national” Linux thing has actually a thing or two to do with the Glorious Motherland’s security. “So, how much are ’150 million rubles’ worth?” You might ask. Well, according to the market exchange rate as per the writing of this FUD tracker piece, 1 ruble can get you roughly around 0.023 euro. Hence, with 150 million rubles, you can fund approximately one-tenth of the Munich Linux migration project, or a national Linux OS project for Russia. Doesn’t that make total sense to you?
“Now, this isn’t the first time we’ve heard reports of Russia’s tech-independence plans. Back in 2007, meanwhile, Moscow decreed that all schools in the state must switch to Linux-based software by next year, according to the Moscow Times.”
To quote Vladimir Sorokin, the teacher who supposedly got fired for advocating open-source, “most Moscow schools were using pirated software until the state program was announced three years ago. As a stopgap measure, Moscow authorities purchased licenses for Windows and other programs being run on the city’s school computers for three years, he says.”
Great, an entire school system running on pirated Windows. Who would have thought the Vikings were actually Russians?
“As the Russians have found, vendor lock-in is not a fun situation for an organization of any size.”
Given the presence of WGA, I think the situation in Moscow was more along the line of “lock-out”.
“Frantically recurring hardware upgrades to keep pace with software requirements become a thing of the past when you switch to Linux.”
Yep, why upgrade your hardware when you can keep it until it is worth being put on Antique Roadshow? Sure your productivity is going to be through the roof with crummy six-year-old workstations and servers from the dumpsters.
“The occasional vulnerability is bound to crop up in any operating system, but nothing matches the rate at which bugs target Windows, as Russia has evidently noticed. That’s due in large part to the way privileges are assigned, and to the fact that Windows is now such a monoculture, creating a compellingly huge target for malware and an easy way to make it spread.”
Seriously, this is nothing but regurgitation of the same old crap from “Crazy Cat Lady Speaks Again”, and I am not going to spend any more word debunking it all over again.
“Stability and reliability are both hallmarks of Linux, both on the server and on the desktop. Whereas unplanned downtime is a fact of life with Windows — and a frequent one, at that — your business could be virtually downtime-free if you made the switch to Linux.”
Again: [citation needed]
“Not much to say on this one. Free vs. expensive per-seat licensing? No need to keep upgrading your hardware? Better reliability and less downtime? All told, the savings can amount to some $400 to $500 per desktop.”
Yeah, march on, my below-minimum-wage Linux Admin Red Army!


Comments
You missed out FiveReasons™, Joe. Seriously, does Katzi have Asperger’s, or what?
I’m eagerly anticipating the “What Windows Users Can Learn From The People’s Republic Of Kampuchea” post. It’s only a matter of time.
Apparently this lady knows about Russia even less, than she does about Linux or Windows.
http://www.transparency.org/policy_research/surveys_indices/cpi/2010/results
This is what happens. Corruption-vise Russia is just on the same level as Cambodia, Papua New Guinea, Kenya, Central African Republic etc. and not too much Higher than Afghanistan or Iraq
> Moscow decreed that all schools in the state must switch to Linux-based software by next year, according to the Moscow Times.
As far as I remember they’ve already spent like 90M RUR on this project and failed miserably. First time, they’ve sent DVD-s to all schools, it appeared that those DVDs were not even bootable. Second time – all Cyrillic filenames appeared to be broken (Cyrillic is sorta-kinda important in Russia)
And about this particular 150M RUR project. Russian politicians have HUGE experience in stealing money. Here are some examples (automatically translated from Russian):
http://translate.google.com/translate?js=n&prev=_t&hl=en&ie=UTF-8&layout=2&eotf=1&sl=auto&tl=en&u=http://navalny.livejournal.com/514097.html&act=url
“What Your Business Can Learn from Russia”, indeed
@Linsuxoid
Fruitcakes like Noyes kind of make me wonder as to how crap such as this manages to slip into the printing press without raising an eyebrow. Even if you forget about the fact her blog entries are consistently comprised of the same five regurgitated points, there is simply no way on earth for any reasonable editor to consider a fluff piece completely devoid of critical thinking as passable material for an opinion column. Seriously, did it not occur to any one of the cretins at PC World that 150 million rubles were in fact an abysmal budget for catering a multi-purpose operating system to the the entire nation of Russia?
Well, she’s managed one four (http://www.oswmag.com/article/4-reasons-give-linux-mint-10-try), one two (http://www.cio.com.au/article/365174/two_vulnerabilities_provide_root_access_linux/ — I dno’t think she felt the need to look very hard), a twelve (http://www.cio.com.au/article/363763/12_reasons_try_ubuntu_10_10_sunday/ — she must have wet her pants) and, I think, two tens (http://www.pcworld.com/businesscenter/article/201731/ten_reasons_to_dump_windows_and_use_linux.html — which is particularly hilarious: .NET support is a reason to dump Windows! — and http://www.cio.com.au/author/214055909/katherine-noyes/articles, which sadly doesn’t show up, though I heartily approve of her moving out and bashing MySpace for no readily apparent reason).
On the whole, though, it’s five. Sometimes the same article appears in more than one “tech magazine” at once. There’s a distressingly large number of soft touches out there.
You’er right, though. I can only conclude that none of these people own a calculator or subscribe to the WSJ. Neither of which comes as a surprise, considering the business they’re in.
@JoeMonco
Yes the press really doesn’t check these stories, any kind of nonsense can get published.
An example: Two days ago I’m reading a Linux (it was oopoopoo) article, and bam the stupid hits me:
“Linux has no viruses, but if it did they could only destroy what’s inside the users directory so everything is A OK”
But wait it then goes beyond stupid and says: “Linux may never have any viruses, and that is due to its excellent security model, the user/superuser separation”.
I couldn’t read any more, I had to close the web page.
The Stupid, It Still Burns… aaaa….
Note: the online article was previously published in what is the single most respected local tech magazine; also the text is abbreviated not directly copied.
You must be signed in to leave comments.